Behind the Barcode is a series of industry reports which seek to empower consumers to purchase ethically and, by doing so, encourage companies to ensure workers are protected and not harmed; that they are rewarded and not exploited; and that they can work free from the tyranny of modern slavery.
One of these industry reports is the Electronic Industry Trends Report. It is released with an accompanying Ethical Electronics Guide. The research published in the 2016 Electronic Industry Trends Report grades 100 electronics brands operating in Australia and around the world, and assesses the systems they have in place to protect the workers in their supply chain from exploitation, forced labour and child labour.
Higher grades correspond to companies that have stronger systems in place to mitigate the risks of forced labour, child labour and exploitation. That is, companies with the best grades (A and A+) are those companies that have a strong code of conduct, are investing substantially in knowing who their suppliers are, and are actively monitoring and building relationships with those suppliers to ensure adherence to their code of conduct. These companies are also actively seeking to empower workers and taking active measures to ensure that their workers are receiving a living wage. In combination, these steps substantially reduce the risks of slavery and exploitation. Low graded companies are those that are not taking these initiatives or, if they are, have chosen not to disclose it.
It is important to note that a high grade does not mean that a company has a supply chain which is free from exploitation. Rather, it is an indicator of the efforts undertaken and the strength of the systems a company has in place to reduce the risk of exploitation. Furthermore, our grading methodology is designed to spread companies out along the “A-F continuum” based on the relative strength of their efforts, similar to awarding grades on a bell curve (i.e. best performers receiving A’s, worst receiving F’s and many in the middle). It is also worth noting that we do not do site inspections of suppliers and production facilities and, in some instances, we have relied on audit data provided to us by companies to verify conditions and benefits that workers receive.
The grades awarded in this report are a measure of the efforts undertaken by each company to mitigate the risks of forced labour, child labour and worker exploitation throughout their supply chains. Higher grades correspond to companies with a labour rights management system that, if implemented well, should reduce the risk and extent of worker exploitation in the production of that company’s products.
These grades are derived from research undertaken by Baptist World Aid Australia and published in The Electronics Industry Trends Report.
Our research team uses the Free2Work grading tool and methodology which was developed in conjunction with Not For Sale and the International Labor Rights Forum. This grading tool asks a set of 61 questions about a company’s production policies and practices. The questions address each company’s management of mineral extraction, smelting and refining, and final manufacturing, and fall into four categories:
Our research team asks companies for evidence that they are paying workers a living wage. A living wage is defined as a wage sufficient to support all the basic needs of a worker and his or her dependents with some money left over for discretionary spending and saving for emergencies. This amount varies between country and city. The legal minimum wage in many countries is not sufficient for all basic needs and leaves many workers trapped in a cycle of poverty.
Companies are asked to provide an audit report which demonstrates that wages being paid are above minimum wage and (if applicable) any additional livelihood services, such as healthcare or education, are being provided. Companies are also asked to provide documentation demonstrating that they have developed a methodology to understand and calculate a living wage and have completed formal calculations to demonstrate that living wages are being paid.
Our research team grades companies based on the publically available information in their sustainability reports, annual reports and websites. It then follows up by actively seeking to engage companies to verify its findings and invites them to provide additional information about their practices. For those companies that are non-responsive initially, our research team commits to engaging them through the use of at least three different mediums (e.g. letters, phone calls and emails), it also sends them the final assessment, allowing companies an opportunity to respond. In the majority of instances where companies don’t respond, it’s because they have chosen not to.
Baptist World Aid Australia believes that it’s important that we grade these companies. If companies haven’t been transparent about what they are doing to uphold worker rights, then how can the public feel confident that their products are being made in a way that is free of exploitation?
Both the report and the guide highlight the companies which haven’t responded to our research team by marking them with an asterisks. We welcome their engagement for our future research.
Baptist World Aid Australia is committed to working productively with companies in order to let the public know what they are doing to uphold worker rights and to help them take further action on this critical issue. Our research team is always interested in hearing more about what activities companies have engaged in to address exploitation, and often shares these stories with supporters of the Electronics Industry Trends Report.
We also encourage you to write to the companies included in the guide and directly inform them that you are a customer who would like to see them guarantee the workers in their supply chain a living wage. Use our letter writing templates to contact the brands you love. Encourage the report’s best performers and thank them for their efforts. Call on those who received a D grade or lower to do more to protect the workers in their supply chain. Your voice can be a catalyst for change!